The Money Quote about the Poll results:
No one spread the word as effectively as the man who tops the list. In early May, the Top 100 list was mentioned on the front page of Zaman, a Turkish daily newspaper closely aligned with Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen. Within hours, votes in his favor began to pour in. His supporters—typically educated, upwardly mobile Muslims—were eager to cast ballots not only for their champion but for other Muslims in the Top 100. Thanks to this groundswell, the top 10 public intellectuals in this year’s reader poll are all Muslim. The ideas for which they are known, particularly concerning Islam, differ significantly. It’s clear that, in this case, identity politics carried the day.
When I read the poll results (without first reading the above paragraph) I was nearly apoplectic that someone described as a muslim Televangelist was rated higher than Richard Dawkins, and that Al Gore was on it at all… phew. I was up in arms over it, at least emotionally.
This is one of those times when one has to examine their personal prejudices and determine if your reaction is to the “Islam” or to the “Religious” part of it. Did I react badly because the top ten are foreign and unknown to me or because they are overwhelmingly Muslim? This is a troubling line of questioning, isn’t it? I guess if you are conservative and wrong, the answers are easy here, but when you are a thinking liberal who has to examine the whole list and determine what you think of it, the answers aren’t as easy.
It seems that the top ten list is made up of religious personalities, akin to the list being full of American Televangelists and the Pope. This kind of framing, in my mind, puts to rest any queasiness I have about the list and of course the fact that it was made via open public gaming of the poll makes it even less troubling. Imagine if Free Republic and Stormfront had come out in force to vote on the list? I imagine that personal politics would color it there too.
So, in the end. Am I being racist in my reaction to this list. Most likely, there is certainly a strong xenophobic bent in my initial reaction that can’t be passed of as me immediately noting the religious trappings of the top ten, but I went on and read the list and tried to gain a better understanding of how it came about and used reason over emotion to judge it. I think that is the best we can hope for, that reason is our fallback plan when we think our emotions are overwhelming us.
Also, Stephen Colbert is the “write in” winner. I think we can put this list to bed as “typical web poll garbage” and sleep easier for it, or at least congratulate the voting public for having their voice heard.
It's hard to write about Canadian Politics
Published by NiteMayr on July 24, 2008Some days, when I’m not writing about Miniature Popes and Singing Peas I look at the Google News Page for inspiration; I’d like to write more about Canadian Politics but it’s far too dull and I simly can’t get excited about it.
For Example: Dion sensing mood for an election
I hoped initially that this was going to be about Celine Dion and quietly replaced all of the references to Stephan to Celine in my head; thus:
Now we’re getting somewhere; you can actually imagine that animate skelton crooning these lines out on stage, butchering the English language while she belts it out. That would make the whole idea of anyone named “Dion” running for Prime Minister that much more exciting. He’s just not that much of a character. Which is a detriment in politics (if one was to ask me).
Stephen Harper angries up my blood when he ISN’T the prime minister because he gets to say and do outrageous crap. As Prime Minister, he has his cabinet to do that for him. Sure, he has a shocking lack of humanity and the look of a “true believer” that is equal parts unnerving and creepy; but let’s face it being in the public eye has really mellowed him. He’s no George Bush Jr. He’s George Bush Juniors monkey.